Argumentation is stating a clear claim and backing it with evidence and reasoning; analysis is examining that evidence closely to show what it means. Together they lift writing from merely describing things to actually arguing something — which is the whole point of academic work.

Here’s the leap that separates strong academic writing from weak: weak writing summarises (“here is what happened, here is what others said”); strong writing argues (“here is what I claim, here is my evidence, here is why it holds”). Markers reward the second every time — it shows thinking, not just reading.

The anatomy of an argument

• A claim — a clear, debatable position (if no one could disagree, it’s not an argument).
• Evidence — data, examples, or sources that support it.
• Reasoning — the link that shows why the evidence supports the claim (the step writers most often skip).
• Counter-arguments — honestly addressing the other side, which makes your case stronger, not weaker.

Don’t skip the reasoning

The commonest weakness is a claim and some evidence with no reasoning between them — leaving the reader to guess the connection. Spelling out why your evidence proves your point is what turns information into insight. Never make the reader do that work for you.

🔗 A friendly free guide: Excelsior OWL — Argument & Critical Thinking

A first draft is never the finished argument. Making it sharp is the next craft. On to Revision & Editing.

© FRELIP, released under CC BY 4.0. Linked resources remain under their own licences. Curated by the FRELIP Open Courseware editorial team.